Legal Opinion

Quigley v. Telsat Inc., 23481 (6-13-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2007No. 23481PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

This cause was heard upon the record in the trial court. Each error assigned has been reviewed and the following disposition is made: {¶ 1} Appellants, Telsat Inc. ("Telsat"), Caroline Mueller, John Does 1-3, and George Sintsirmas ("Sintsirmas"), appeal the decision of the Cuyahoga Falls Municipal Court disqualifying attorney Sintsirmas. We affirm.

I

{¶ 2} On April 25, 2006, Appellee, Michael Quigley, filed a complaint against Appellants, alleging breach of contract, unjust enrichment and fraud. Appellee specifically alleged that Sintsirmas, in his individual and in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Mentor Lagoons, Inc. v. RubinOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. 155 North High, Ltd. v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Puritas Metal Prods., Inc. v. Cole, 07ca009255 (9-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Karaman v. Pickrel, Ca21813 (8-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API