Legal Opinion

Hocking v. Howard Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 4, 1889No. 94PublishedCited by 37 opinions

APPEAL BY DEPENDANT PROM THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS OP SOMERSET COUNTY. No. 94 October Term 1889, Snp. Ct.; court below, No. 157 December Term 1887, C. P. On November 21,1887, George H. Hocking brought assumpsit against the Howard Insurance Company of New York, to recover upon a policy of insurance for $2,000 against loss and damage by fire, dated March 24,1884, for a certain building and contents in Meyersdale. The defendant pleaded nonassumpsit.

Read the full summary

APPEAL BY DEPENDANT PROM THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS OP SOMERSET COUNTY. No. 94 October Term 1889, Snp. Ct.; court below, No. 157 December Term 1887, C. P. On November 21,1887, George H. Hocking brought assumpsit against the Howard Insurance Company of New York, to recover upon a policy of insurance for $2,000 against loss and damage by fire, dated March 24,1884, for a certain building and contents in Meyersdale. The defendant pleaded nonassumpsit. At the trial on December 21, 1888, the plaintiff put in evidence the policy of insurance upon which suit was brought. This policy provided that the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion,

Mr. Justice Mitchell:

The validity of the special agreement as to the time of bringing any action on the policy is conceded: Farmers Ins. Co. v. Barr, 94 Pa. 345; North W. Ins. Co. v. Oil & Candle Co., 31 Pa. 448; Waynesboro Ins. Co. v. Conover, 98 Pa. 384; Universal Ins. Co. v. Weiss, 106 Pa. 20. It follows, therefore, that the statutes of limitation do not apply. The very object and spirit of the agreement are to exclude the operation of the statute which would otherwise govern. And in the present case the exclusion is so clear and express that nothing short of an entire disregard of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Wilkinson v. First National Fire Insurance Co. of WorcesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Arthur v. . Homestead Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Wilson v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
  5. Waynesboro Mutual Fire Insurance v. ConoverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Transport Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. Transamerica InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Harrison v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Fred Miller Brewing Co. v. Capital InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Fratto v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API