Legal Opinion

Gondak v. Wilson Gas Coal Co. (Et Al.)

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1942No. Appeal, 97PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peb Cubiam,

The appellee’s motion to quash the appeal must pre vail. We are satisfied from an examination of the record, in connection with the opinion of the court below, that the order of the court remitting the record to the board, in order that additional and unequivocal medical testimony may be taken, is interlocutory and that an appeal does not lie from it.

We may add that the testimony of the physicians should be directed to á statement of the physical condition of the claimant’s elbow and upper arm, rather than the legal effect of it. It is admitted that he has lost the use of his hand.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pocono Mountain School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Messikomer v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Marshall v. ALTOONASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Thompson v. Frank IX & SonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API