Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Frank IX & Sons

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 1, 1977No. 7622IC877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The sole issue for consideration on this appeal is whether plaintiff is entitled to be paid compensation for disfigurement after having previously received compensation for the permanent partial disability of his hand.

*354The rate of compensation payable to employees under the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act is set forth in G.S. 97-31, which provides in pertinent part:

“In cases included by the following schedule the compensation in each case shall be paid for disability during the healing period and in addition the disability shall be deemed to continue for the period…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Duke Power Company v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Finoia v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  4. National Surety Corporation v. WinderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Gondak v. Wilson Gas Coal Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liles v. Charles Lee Byrd Logging Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Collins v. Columbia Carolina Corp.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API