Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. Allred

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1934No. 6642PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge CRITZ

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

This is an original mandamus proceeding instituted by the City of Houston, Texas, hereinafter called Relator, against James V. Allred, Attorney General of Texas, hereinafter called Respondent, to compel his approval of certain Water Works Revenue Bonds issued by Relator.

Relator is a Home Rule City of more than 290,000 population duly organized as such under the Constitution and laws of this State. Relator also operates under a charter duly ratified and approved by its qualified voters. As authorized by the statutes…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lanford v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. Candler v. Court of Civil AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. McCarty v. JarvisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Salgo v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Atwood C. B. F. v. GallagherTexas Supreme Court · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API