Salgo v. Hoffman
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GUITTARD, Justice.
This original proceeding is a second sequel to our decision in Salgo v. Matthews, 497 S.W.2d 620 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1973, writ ref’d n. r. e.). In Salgo v. Hoffman, 515 S.W.2d 756 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1974, no writ), we denied petitioner Salgo’s application for mandamus and injunction to declare the five “management candidates” elected. Petitioner then returned to the trial court and applied for an order restoring control of the corporation to the three-man board of directors composed of Salgo, Bell and Matthews, who were in office at the time of the stockholders’ meeting…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wells v. LittlefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- United States v. United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Salgo v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- City of Houston v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Kelly v. LobitCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Baca v. Hoover, Bax, & ShearerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Muller v. Leyendecker, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
- Currie v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Curtis v. NoblesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. BBE, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.