Legal Opinion

Lanford v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1936No. Motion No. 12,737PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Critz

This is a motion to file an original • petition for mandamus in this Court. It is sought to have the Court of Civil Appeals certify certain alleged conflicts under Article 1855, R. C. S., 1925. The motion was filed by J. E. Lanford et al. against the Honorable Justices of the Court of Civil Appeals at San Antonio. It makes no other party or parties. The petition which accompanies the motion -is rather meagre, but from all the instruments before us we gather the following facts:

Emma Lovett et al. sued J. E. Lanford et'al. in the District Court of Hidalgo County," Texas, on a note alleged to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Compton v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. GallagherTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. City of Houston v. AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Atwood C. B. F. v. GallagherTexas Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Hall, C.J.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Schwartz v. Pinnacle Communications, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  3. Comet Motor Freight Lines v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Pan American Fire & Casualty Company v. LoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Industrial Accident Board v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API