Legal Opinion

Treat v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1909No. Docket No. 117PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Oakland; Smith, J. Ejectment by Joseph A. Treat against the Detroit United Railway. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

Plaintiff, on May 24, 1900, and for some years prior thereto, was the owner of certain lands situated on section 35 of the township of Oxford. On that day he entered into the following agreement with the Detroit, Rochester, Romeo & Lake Orion Railway:

“This contract, made this twenty-fourth day of May, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred, between Joseph A. Treat, of Stuart, State of Iowa, party of the first part, and the Detroit, Rochester, Remeo & Lake Orion Railway, a corporation, existing under the laws of the State of Michigan, party of the second part, witnesseth, that said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Getty v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Dade County v. City of North Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Sliwinski v. GootsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Weber v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. August v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API