Sliwinski v. Gootstein
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Plaintiffs, vendors in an executory land contract, served notice of forfeiture on defendants, the purchasers, brought ejectment, and had verdict, but on a motion for judgment non obstante defendants had judgment. Plaintiffs bring error. The contract'was made in 1917. Two thousand dollars was paid down. Defendants promised and agreed to pay thereafter $125 or more on the 10th day of each month. The contract states that “time shall be of the essence of this contract.” Defendants did not pay promptly. They were tardy, grievously and persistently. On three different occasions plaintiff instituted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Waller v. LiebermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Barnard v. German American SeminaryMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Zadigian v. GardMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Letinsky v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Stepanian v. MoskovitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fritts v. Cloud Oak Flooring CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Collins v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Weber v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Kipp v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Minchella v. FredericksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.