Legal Opinion
Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 6, 2009No. SC 18075Published
1Opinion of the Court
961 A.2d 373 (2009)
290 Conn. 1
Gerald HEES et al.
v.
BURKE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
No. 18075.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Argued September 4, 2008.
Decided January 6, 2009.
Scott M. Harrington, Stamford, for the appellant (defendant).
Richard H. Raphael, Westport, for the appellees (plaintiffs).
ROGERS, C.J., and NORCOTT, PALMER, ZARELLA and SCHALLER, Js.
NORCOTT, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a violation of the Home Improvement Act (act), General Statutes § 20-418 et seq., and specifically, General Statutes § 20-429(a),[1] precludes a home improvement contractor from reducing the damages…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Liljedahl Bros. v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Barrett Builders v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Caulkins v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.