Legal Opinion

Modad Taxicab Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 2, 1980No. Appeal, No. 1423 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Modad Taxicab Company and Carbondale Transfer Company (petitioners), common carriers under joint ownership serving carbondale, Lackawanna County, appeal here from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) granting a certificate of public convenience to Robert R. Ashby (applicant) to operate a competing taxicab service. At the time of the hearing, the petitioners operated five taxicabs in a service area of approximately 30,000 people, while the applicant proposed to operate four taxicabs.

Section 1103 of the Public Utility Code, 66 Pa. C.S. §1103,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Moderm Trans. Co. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Com.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Tranter v. P.U.C.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. Purolator Courier Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ace Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API