Legal Opinion

Ace Moving & Storage, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COLINS.

Numerous moving and storage companies (Protestants) have filed a petition for review of an order of the Public Utility Commission that denied exceptions the Protestants had filed to a decision of an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) who had denied their objections to an application filed by Shannon Transport, Inc. to expand its right as a common carrier to transport by motor vehicle household goods between points in the counties of Philadelphia, Delaware, Chester, Montgomery, Bucks, Berks, Lehigh, and Northampton, limited to the provision of services for clients or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yellow Cab Co. of Pittsburgh v. CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Modad Taxicab Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lehigh Valley Transportation Services, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Capital City Cab Serv. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API