Legal Opinion

Housing Authority of Seminole Nation v. Harjo

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 17, 1990No. 67999PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice:

Josephine Harjo, a fullblood Seminole Indian, fell behind on her monthly housing payments to the Seminole Housing Authority. The Housing Authority brought suit in the District Court of Seminole County under the state’s Forcible Entry and De-tainer statutes. Harjo moved to dismiss asserting that the state court had no jurisdiction over her home because it was in Indian country. She also claimed, in the alternative, certain other defenses and set-offs. The Housing Authority won below on all issues, and she appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed but we have granted certiorari.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Seymour v. Superintendent of Washington State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. Anthony Damian AzureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Housing Authority of the Kaw Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. City of Ponca City, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Lewis v. Sac & Fox Tribe of Oklahoma Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island v. Narragansett Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island v. Narragansett Electric Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1995
  5. Richardson v. MaloneDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API