Legal Opinion

Monarch Healthcare v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 2000No. G025877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, J

The discovery rules do not discriminate against nonparty deponents. They need not scramble to retain a lawyer to file a motion to quash in order to challenge “records only” discovery requests that seek privileged information. It is sufficient to simply object.

I

Andrew Cassidenti, the head of an obstetrical medical practice group, sued Brian Koperek and other doctors for unfairly competing to secure a managed care contract from Monarch Healthcare covering some 100,000 Orange County residents. Koperek broke away from Cassidenti in 1995 and allegedly used confidential information…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Los Angeles County Department of Adoptions v. Robert E.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Peatros v. BANK OF AMERICA NT & SACalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. MendezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Monarch Healthcare v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API