Legal Opinion

Main Union Associates v. Township of Little Falls Rent Leveling Board

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 23, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

NEWMAN, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs, Main Union Associates and Brownstone Associates, unsuccessfully challenged the facial constitutionality of the Rent Leveling Ordinance of defendant Township of Little Falls (hereafter Township or Little Falls) because of the ordinance’s failure to provide a separate mechanism by which to recover capital improvement surcharges. Plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

Plaintiffs own two garden apartments located across the street from each other in the Township of Little Falls: Brownstone Apartments, consisting of 80 rental units, and Main…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Inganamort v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  5. Helmsley v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heyert v. TaddeseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API