Legal Opinion

Sinz v. Meredith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 21, 1938No. 5484PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice.

This is an application for mandamus against Hon. D. S. Meredith, district judge of the Special district court of Gregg county, and R., Lacy, Edwin Lacy, and George Prendergast, parties defendant, in a certain suit, No. 10235-B, in which relator is-plaintiff, to compel Hon. D. S. Meredith, district judge, to proceed to try said cause.

It appears that R. Lacy, Edwin Lacy, and George Prendergast purchased the leasehold interest of relator in certain oil-producing lands in Gregg county, Tex., aggregating 12½ acres, and as a part of the consideration therefor they executed and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cain v. BonnerTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Ward v. ScarboroughTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Matagorda Canal Co. v. StylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Brammer v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowman v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API