Legal Opinion
Madison v. Graham
District Court, D. Montana
Decided January 4, 2001No. CV00-18-H-CCLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LOVELL, Senior District Judge.
Before the court are the motions to dismiss filed by the State Defendants and the Defendant-Intervenors. These motions came on regularly for hearing on December 13, 2000. The court heard argument by William Perry Pendley for the Plaintiffs, by Stephen C. Bullock for the State Defendants, and by James H. Goetz for the Defendanb-Intervenors. The court, having considered the briefs filed by the parties and the arguments made at hearing, is prepared to rule.
Plaintiffs seek by their Complaint to enjoin the State Defendants permanently from enforcing…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Madison v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Public Lands Access Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Madison v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Public Lands Access Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2014