Legal Opinion

Ostler v. Industrial Commission of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1934No. 5495PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

The petitioner, E. D. Ostler, filed an application with the Industrial Commission of the State of Utah, for a compensation adjustment under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Rev. St. 1938, § 42-1-1 et seq.), alleging injuries growing out of an accident while employed by the Newhouse Realty Company. The alleged accident occurred on the 28th day of June, 1932. The Industrial Commission held two formal hearings, one on January 5, 1933, and the other on May 8, 1933, and denied compensation. The injury for which compensation is sought is derivative in its nature. The applicant has a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kavalinakis v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Garfield Smelting Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Utah Delaware Min. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Globe Grain & Milling Co. v. Industrial Commisson of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Utah Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McPhie v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Russell v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Ellis v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Crowley v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  5. McKay Dee Hospital v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API