Legal Opinion

Garfield Smelting Co. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1918No. 3277PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Salt Lake County, Third District; Hon. B. B. Porter, Judge. Action by the Garfield Smelting Company against the Industrial Commission of the State of Utah. Judgment of dismissal. .Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFbick, C. J.

The questions presented by this appeal are based upon and arise out of the provisions of chapter 100, Laws Utah 1917, commonly known as the Industrial Commission Act, hereinafter designated as the Industrial Act. That act has been before us on two other occasions, namely, in Industrial Commission v. Daly Mining Co., 51 Utah, 602, 172 Pac. 301, and in Industrial Commission v. Evans, 52 Utah, 394, 174 Pac. 825, where a number of sections of that act were construed and applied. To avoid unnecessary repetition we refer to those cases, and shall in this opinion set forth only such portions of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Matter of Carroll v. . Knickerbocker Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Reck v. WhittlesbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. VosburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Englebretson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bybee v. AbdullaUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Utah Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Cudahy Packing Co. of Nebraska v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API