Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Oakland County Gas & Oil Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1936No. Docket No. 30, Calendar No. 38,846PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

The contest in this case is between the landlord, the owner of leased premises, and the tenant who erected buildings thereon for the purpose of operating an oil and gas station. The lease contained no specific provision as to the ownership of the buildings at the expiration of the leasehold. The rights of the parties are governed by the applicable law.

The sole question involved is whether the tenant has a right to remove the buildings erected by him upon the leased premises, during the continuance of his lease or within a reasonable time after its expiration.

There is no claim the buildings…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kerr v. KingsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Merchants' National Bank of Crookston v. StantonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Manwaring v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Curtiss v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848
  5. Watriss v. First National Bank of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Michigan National Bank v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. R & D AMUSEMENT CORP. v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Andrews v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  4. Handler v. HornsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  5. Young Electric Sign Co. v. Erwin Electric Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API