Solomon v. Township of Oscoda
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Iosco. (Simpson, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
This action was brought to recover certain moneys which the plaintiff had paid as taxes under protest, on the ground that they were illegally assessed.
The plaintiff was the owner of a stock of merchandise in the township of Oscoda, Iosco county, Michigan, and was by the supervisor assessed at a valuation of $1,500. This amount the board of review increased to $2,500. The State, county, town, highway, school, and one-mill tax extended against her property amounted to $114=. 65.
The supervisor and other members of the board of review were sworn in the cause, and from their testimony it appeal’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Merrill v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Walsh v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by11 opinions
- Peterson v. HancockNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- Newport Mining Co. v. City of IronwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Copper Range Co. v. Adams TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- General v. Pioneer Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Fletcher Paper Co. v. City of AlpenaMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.