In re Duquesne Incandescent Light Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
In the matter of the bankruptcy of the Duquesne Incandescent Light Company. On certificate of the referee to review certain questions with reference to the disallowance of the claim of the Iron City Stamping Company.
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, District Judge.
This case comes before us upon the report of Wm. R. Blair, referee in bankruptcy, and his certificate presenting for our review certain questions. As all these questions except the fourth are questions of fact, we do not find, after a careful consideration of the evidence, that the referee erred in his decision allowing, or disallowing the claims. His findings are abundantly, sustained by the evidence, and, were the case before us originally, we *787should have decided as lie has. This leaves only the fourth question to be considered. That question is stated as follows:
‘‘Four…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Guthrie's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Hutchinson v. DeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Yates v. Whyel Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Outcault Advertising Co. v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Heyward v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
- de Jesús v. Corte de Distrito de San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1932
- de Jesús v. District Court of San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1932