Legal Opinion

Outcault Advertising Co. v. Citizens National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1925No. 25,854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The" opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one for damages for breach of a contract to purchase advertising supplies. Trial was to the court. Plaintiff was awarded judgment for nominal damages only, and appeals.

The plaintiff manufactures, assembles and sells to banks a system of copyrighted advertising supplies and materials. On May 12, 1920, it entered into a contract with the defendant which reads:

“May 12, 1920.
“To Outcault Advertising Co.,

506 So. Dearborn St., Chicago, 111.

“Ship us, at our expense, your bank ‘ad’ service, which covers a period of five years,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atomic Fuel Extraction Corporation v. Slick's EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Vickers v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Kvassay v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  5. Health Related Services, Inc. v. Golden Plains Convalescent Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API