Outcault Advertising Co. v. Citizens National Bank
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The" opinion of the court was delivered by
Hopkins, J.:
The action was one for damages for breach of a contract to purchase advertising supplies. Trial was to the court. Plaintiff was awarded judgment for nominal damages only, and appeals.
The plaintiff manufactures, assembles and sells to banks a system of copyrighted advertising supplies and materials. On May 12, 1920, it entered into a contract with the defendant which reads:
“May 12, 1920.
“To Outcault Advertising Co.,
506 So. Dearborn St., Chicago, 111.
“Ship us, at our expense, your bank ‘ad’ service, which covers a period of five years,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atomic Fuel Extraction Corporation v. Slick's EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Vickers v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Kvassay v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
- Health Related Services, Inc. v. Golden Plains Convalescent Center, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.