Legal Opinion

Newriter v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 4, 1934No. 7 Div. 262PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The initial pleading consisted of a complaint alleging the issue of the policy on December 21, 1931, on the life of Roy L. Gladden, designating as beneficiary, appellant (the mother), and containing other necessary averments not here recited.

To the several counts of the complaint, defendant filed pleas, among which was the following:

“For further plea says the policy sued on contains the following provision:
“ ‘If a like Travel and Pedestrian policy or policies previously issued by the Company to the insured be in force concurrently here- , with, making the aggregate indemnity…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Equitable Assur. Co. v. Powderly Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Royal Exchange Assurance of London v. AlmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. American Cent. Life Ins. v. First Nat. Bank of EnterpriseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. American Life Ins. Co. v. BuntynSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. American Ins. Co. v. InzerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Butler v. Standard Life Ins. Co. of the SouthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Howard v. Mutual Sav. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Provident Life Accident Ins. Co. v. HudgensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Mims v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API