Legal Opinion

American Ins. Co. v. Inzer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 13, 1927No. 7 Div. 737PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, O. J.

The proof-shows that Goddard was defendant’s soliciting agent; that the policy had to be countersigned by him to become effective; that it was so countersigned and delivered to the insured. it also appears that Goddard took the insured’s application and while preparing same was fully and fairly informed of the existence and status of the previous policy in the Home Company and informed said insured that said Home policy was not an existing one within the terms of the application and thereby induced him to state in the application that he had no other insurance. This conduct…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alabama State Mutual Assurance Co. v. Long Clothing & Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Brown v. Commercial Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Commercial Fire Insurance v. Capital City InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  4. Aetna Fire Ins. v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Robinson v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Equitable Assur. Co. v. Powderly Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Yorkshire Ins. Co. v. GazisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Tennessee Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Tutton v. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Newriter v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of TennesseeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API