Legal Opinion

Leatherwood v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 5, 2008No. AC 27784PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Mark Leatherwood, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the court improperly failed to conclude that his trial attorney, Robert Meredith, rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to ensure that the petitioner pleaded guilty voluntarily. Specifically, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that Meredith did not render ineffective assistance of counsel when he failed to investigate adequately whether a knife recovered by police had the petitioner’s…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Levine v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Ricks v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Corona v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Moye v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Stevens v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. James G. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. Ryan v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API