Moye v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The petitioner, Marcus Moye, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He claims that (1) the court erred in rejecting his claim that his trial counsel was ineffective because of his failure to investigate the case properly and to present an alibi defense, and (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his trial and appellate counsel did not raise a double jeopardy claim. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
*327The following facts, as set forth in this court’s opinion regarding the petitioner’s direct appeal,…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Crawford v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Henderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Hunnicutt v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Whistnant v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Banks v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2023
- Moye v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
- Russell v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014