Legal Opinion

Moye v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 24, 2013No. AC 34827PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Marcus Moye, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He claims that (1) the court erred in rejecting his claim that his trial counsel was ineffective because of his failure to investigate the case properly and to present an alibi defense, and (2) he was denied effective assistance of counsel when his trial and appellate counsel did not raise a double jeopardy claim. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

*327The following facts, as set forth in this court’s opinion regarding the petitioner’s direct appeal,…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Crawford v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Henderson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. Hunnicutt v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whistnant v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  2. Banks v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2023
  3. Moye v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
  4. Russell v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API