Legal Opinion

Page v. Comey

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 1, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2020-3460Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CARTER PAGE, Plaintiff, v. No. 20-cv-3460 (DLF) JAMES B. COMEY et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION As part of its investigation into the alleged connection between the Trump 2016 presidential campaign and the Russian government, the Federal Bureau of Investigation obtained warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to electronically surveil Carter Page, an informal advisor to the campaign. Page alleges that the surveillance was unlawful because the warrant applications were false and misleading. He brings…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API