Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Ancell

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1943No. 2445—7996PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Commissioner.

The parties to this suit are in three groups. One group, the Ancells, plaintiffs in the trial court, consists of the widow, son and daughters of George B. Ancell, Sr.,' deceased, the daughters being joined by their husbands. Another group, the Claytons, defendants in the trial court, con*231sists of the widow, son and daughter of Dr. R. L. Clayton, deceased, the daughter being joined by her husband. The remaining defendants, referred to in the briefs as Appel et al., who claim under a certain power of attorney under the Clay-tons, compose the third group. No questions are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bruni v. VidaurriTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Allen v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Jones v. SilerTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Lobban v. WierhauserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Clayton v. AncellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Edwards v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Sorrells v. CoffieldTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Sims v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Mellette v. Hudstan Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Somer v. Bogart, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API