Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Ancell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1942No. 5385PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by the plaintiffs, George B. Ancell, Jr., Mrs. Lute Ancell, a widow, Mrs. Myrtle Richardson and husband, W. C. Richardson, Mrs. Ethel Marie Barnes and husband, J. B. Barnes, hereinafter called the Ancells, complaining of the defendants, Hattie G. Clayton, a widow, Irene Clayton Uthoff and husband, H. C. Uthoff, and R. L. Clayton, Jr., hereinafter called the Claytons, C. L. Apple, W. H. Rogers, J. A. Chase, J. O. Ammons and E. C. Jordan, hereinafter called Apple et al., and the Consolidated Oil Company, a corporation.

The Ancells sought to recover…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. SilerTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. King v. GillelandTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Jackson v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Gross v. Shell Pipe Line Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clayton v. AncellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  2. Clayton v. AncellTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Speights v. DeonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Millsaps v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API