Legal Opinion

Gardner v. City of Cleveland

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 20, 2009No. Case 1:07 CV 1601PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DONALD C. NUGENT, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motions of Defendants City of Cleveland and Earle B. Turner for Summary Judgment(ECF #25) and Plaintiff, Steven L. Gardner, for Summary Judgment. (ECF # 24). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted as to Plaintiffs federal claims and Plaintiffs Motion is denied as to those claims. Further, the Court declines to accept supplement jurisdiction over Plaintiffs remaining state law claims and those claims are remanded to state court.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND 1

Thi…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. City of Sioux City v. Michael Jon JacobsmaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  3. Reuven Weizberg, David Peter Veng-Pedersen, Jacob Patrick Dagel v. City of Des Moines, Iowa, and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  4. Tate v. Garfield Hts.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Davis v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API