Legal Opinion
Fruman v. City of Detroit
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 31, 1998No. 2:96-cv-75170PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROSEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Albert Fruman commenced this action against the City of Detroit on October 2, 1996 in Wayne County Circuit Court. In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that, in demolishing a vacant building he owned, the City violated his procedural due process rights and is liable to him for damages for trespass and inverse condemnation. The property in question is located at the northeast corner of Gratiot and French Roads in the immediate vicinity of the Detroit City Airport. Defendant timely…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wright v. GENESEE COUNTY CORP.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Antonian v. City of Dearborn HeightsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Cordts v. GriffisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Hescott v. City of SaginawDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Houthoofd v. Tuscola County Road CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.