Legal Opinion
Nishida v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 20, 1957No. 16140PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge.
L. L. Ford had for some years been in the field of processing soybean oil and soybean meal by an oil extraction process, using a solvent known as hexane which is derived from petroleum. In 1950 Ford and others began the construction of a mill for the extraction of oil from soybeans. The appellee, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, had developed and marketed a chemical solvent for processing soybeans known as trichloroethylene. This product was known to the trade as “tri” and our consideration for typists, typesetters and proofreaders induces us to refer to it, wherever…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ford Motor v. WagonerTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
- EI DuPONT DE NEM. & CO. v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. MimsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. LadnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Good Holding Co. v. BoswellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Balido v. Improved MacHinery, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Harrist v. Spencer-Harris Tool Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1962
- Eustace Weekes v. Michigan Chrome & Chemical Company, a Michigan Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Younger v. Dow Corning CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.