Legal Opinion

Younger v. Dow Corning Corporation

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1969No. 45,256PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the manufacturer of a product which is potentially hazardous to health and who gives adequate warning of such potential hazard, by label or otherwise, to its immediate vendee, an industrial user, may be liable in tort to an employee of the vendee for injuries allegedly sustained from such product upon the theory that the manufacturer was negligent in failing to give additional and specific warnings of the product’s potential health hazard to the employee.

The plaintiff in his amended petition…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rowell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Olds Motor Works v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Hubbard-Hall Chemical Company v. Charles L. Silverman, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  5. Stottlemire v. CawoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Mays v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Betty Adams, Joseph Adams v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. Jones v. Hittle Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Bryant v. Technical Research Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API