Younger v. Dow Corning Corporation
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Schroeder, J.:
The issue presented by this appeal is whether the manufacturer of a product which is potentially hazardous to health and who gives adequate warning of such potential hazard, by label or otherwise, to its immediate vendee, an industrial user, may be liable in tort to an employee of the vendee for injuries allegedly sustained from such product upon the theory that the manufacturer was negligent in failing to give additional and specific warnings of the product’s potential health hazard to the employee.
The plaintiff in his amended petition…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rowell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Olds Motor Works v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Hubbard-Hall Chemical Company v. Charles L. Silverman, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
- Stottlemire v. CawoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Mays v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Betty Adams, Joseph Adams v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Jones v. Hittle Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Bryant v. Technical Research Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.