Canfield v. Connecticut Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Cowley district court; Carroll L. Swarts, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
DAWSON, J.:
The plaintiff held an insurance policy for $1000, issued by defendant, to protect his barn from loss or damage by fire, lightning, windstorms, cyclones, and tornadoes. The barn was partially destroyed by a windstorm. After some futile efforts to appraise and determine the amount of the insurance company’s liability in accordance with the terms of the policy, the plaintiff sued the defendant for $1000, alleging the total destruction of the barn.
By agreement of parties, the defendant was permitted to file the following amendment to its answer:
“…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. WynneSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Farmers' & Merchants' Insurance v. DobneySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- British America Assurance Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Amusement Syndicate Co. v. Prussian National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Ringer v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911