Legal Opinion

Canfield v. Connecticut Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1916No. 20,163Published

Appeal from Cowley district court; Carroll L. Swarts, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

DAWSON, J.:

The plaintiff held an insurance policy for $1000, issued by defendant, to protect his barn from loss or damage by fire, lightning, windstorms, cyclones, and tornadoes. The barn was partially destroyed by a windstorm. After some futile efforts to appraise and determine the amount of the insurance company’s liability in accordance with the terms of the policy, the plaintiff sued the defendant for $1000, alleging the total destruction of the barn.

By agreement of parties, the defendant was permitted to file the following amendment to its answer:

“…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. WynneSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Farmers' & Merchants' Insurance v. DobneySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. British America Assurance Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  4. Amusement Syndicate Co. v. Prussian National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Ringer v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API