Legal Opinion

Ringer v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1911No. 17,161PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Bourbon district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

W. M. Ringer recovered' a judgment against the St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad Company on account of an injury received while in its employ, and the defendant appeals. The essential facts, as shown by the plaintiff’s own testimony, may be thus summarized: The plaintiff was a section hand, and had been engaged in that work for over seven years. He and another hand’ were at work under a *168foreman, who directed them to take bars and try to line the track — to move it a little to one side, telling them to hurry up a little, and saying he was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gillaspie v. United Iron-works Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Holt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Gulf, West Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Con. R. R. Co. v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  5. McBride v. Indianapolis Frog & Switch Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. AkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Canfield v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Hawkins v. Southwest Kansas Co-op Svc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API