Legal Opinion

Wertz v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 9, 2002No. 00-418 TPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

In the run-of-the-mill tax refund suit, the income tax is paid, a formal claim for refund is filed, the claim is denied by the IRS, and a *445property-pedigreed refund suit is born. But the simplicity of this normal progression masks the complexity of the underlying provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that govern this process — provisions whose language and interplay the Supreme Court has aptly observed are “not simple.” United States v. Brockamp, 519 U.S. 347, 350, 117 S.Ct. 849, 136 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997). This complexity — lurking in most refund suits — is fully on…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Minehan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Demes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Hinck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Murdock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Peterson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API