Wertz v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
In the run-of-the-mill tax refund suit, the income tax is paid, a formal claim for refund is filed, the claim is denied by the IRS, and a *445property-pedigreed refund suit is born. But the simplicity of this normal progression masks the complexity of the underlying provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that govern this process — provisions whose language and interplay the Supreme Court has aptly observed are “not simple.” United States v. Brockamp, 519 U.S. 347, 350, 117 S.Ct. 849, 136 L.Ed.2d 818 (1997). This complexity — lurking in most refund suits — is fully on…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Minehan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Demes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Hinck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Murdock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Peterson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.