Legal Opinion

Danziger v. Pittsfield Shoe Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1903PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for- the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding. This is an action of assumpsit, begun on September 4, 1900, in the superior court of Cook county by the appellee against the appellant to recover an amount, claimed to be due on account of certain merchandise, consisting of shoes, alleged to have been delivered to the appellant by the appellee.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Appellate Court for- the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding. This is an action of assumpsit, begun on September 4, 1900, in the superior court of Cook county by the appellee against the appellant to recover an amount, claimed to be due on account of certain merchandise, consisting of shoes, alleged to have been delivered to the appellant by the appellee. The declaration consisted of the common counts, and two special counts. In the special counts it was charged, that the appellee…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

Appellee is a corporation, engaged in the business of manufacturing shoes at Pittsfield in the State of New Hampshire. Appellant is engaged in the wholesale shoe business in Chicago.

It appears from the evidence, that appellee, and appellant commenced their business relations in November, 1897. In that month appellant placed an order with appellee for shoes, such order being given by letter written from Chicago. A letter, written by appellant on December 28, 1897, was answered by appellee on December 31, 1897, and from that time down to at least November, 1899, appellee continued to ship goods…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lapp v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Nolan v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Graham v. SadlierIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. North Chicago Street Railway Co. v. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Brooks v. KearnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Webster v. HartmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Zamouski v. GerrardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  3. Brewer v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Williams v. Office of the Chief Judge of Cook CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Szymkowski v. SzymkowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API