Legal Opinion

Wetzler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1966No. Civ. 30313PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiff sought recovery of $5,000 under defendant’s policy which indemnified her for the death of her husband. The cause was submitted for decision on a written stipulation of facts. Plaintiff appeals from judgment entered for defendant. The sole issue is whether the trial court properly construed a certain exclusionary clause in the policy.

Decedent’s death was proximately caused by a collision between a freight train, of which he was a crew member (brakeman), and a truck-trailer loaded with gasoline. In view of his employment as brakeman, it was stipulated (in addition to other matters not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Elliott v. BehnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Prickett v. Royal Ins. Co. Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Allor v. DubayMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hackethal v. National Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Safeco Title Insurance v. MoskopoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Russell v. Bankers Life Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Stearns v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Morris v. ButtneyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API