Wetzler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
Plaintiff sought recovery of $5,000 under defendant’s policy which indemnified her for the death of her husband. The cause was submitted for decision on a written stipulation of facts. Plaintiff appeals from judgment entered for defendant. The sole issue is whether the trial court properly construed a certain exclusionary clause in the policy.
Decedent’s death was proximately caused by a collision between a freight train, of which he was a crew member (brakeman), and a truck-trailer loaded with gasoline. In view of his employment as brakeman, it was stipulated (in addition to other matters not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Elliott v. BehnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Prickett v. Royal Ins. Co. Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Allor v. DubayMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hackethal v. National Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Safeco Title Insurance v. MoskopoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Russell v. Bankers Life Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Stearns v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Morris v. ButtneyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999