Safeco Title Insurance v. Moskopoulos
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
OLDER, J. *
Appellant Paris Moskopoulos appeals from a declaratory judgment determining that respondent Safeco Title Insurance Company (Safeco) has no duty to provide a defense to appellant in an action against him, described hereafter, and awarding to Safeco attorneys’ fees, costs, .expenses and interest in the amount of $14,294.45.
Appellant is a licensed real estate broker and has been engaged in the real estate business for many years. He has been involved in escrow transactions and is familiar with title insurance policies. In 1974 Bea Williams (Bea), a licensed real estate agent,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Walters v. MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Fresno Economy Import Used Cars, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Paramount Properties Co. v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- First Bank of Turley v. Fidelity & Deposit Insurance Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Insurance Co. of the West v. Haralambos Beverage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Stevens v. United General Title InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Wheeler v. ReeseColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.