State v. Burgess
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Oswald, J., entered March 25, 1920, upon a trial and conviction of being a jointist.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The defendant, Burgess, was charged, and upon thé verdict of a jury adjudged guilty, by the superior court for Spokane county, of the offense of being a “jointist,” under the Laws of 1917, p. 60, § 17h, the language of which, so far as necessary to be here noticed, is as follows:
“Any person who opens up, conducts or maintains, either as principal or agent, any place for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, be and. hereby is defined to be a ‘jointist.’ Any person who carries about with him intoxicating liquor for the purpose of the unlawful sale of the same be and hereby is defined to be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
- State v. RousseauWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hodge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- State v. HesselWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. PerrinWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- In RE CHAPIN v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.