Legal Opinion

State v. Burgess

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1920No. 15879PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Oswald, J., entered March 25, 1920, upon a trial and conviction of being a jointist.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendant, Burgess, was charged, and upon thé verdict of a jury adjudged guilty, by the superior court for Spokane county, of the offense of being a “jointist,” under the Laws of 1917, p. 60, § 17h, the language of which, so far as necessary to be here noticed, is as follows:

“Any person who opens up, conducts or maintains, either as principal or agent, any place for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, be and. hereby is defined to be a ‘jointist.’ Any person who carries about with him intoxicating liquor for the purpose of the unlawful sale of the same be and hereby is defined to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. State v. RousseauWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hodge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. State v. HesselWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State v. PerrinWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. In RE CHAPIN v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API