Legal Opinion

Clinard v. Clinard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 1, 1929No. 6961PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. Where an acknowledgment of service has been procured as provided by the statute, the bill of exceptions may be amended in the reviewing court by making any person a party defendant in error who is bound by such service, although such person may not have been named in the bill of exceptions. Acts 1911, pp. 149, 151; Civil Code, (Park) § 6164(b), (Michie) § 6160(2). Where it appears that in a suit brought against several defendants the plaintiff, against whom the judgment was rendered, sued out a. bill of exceptions to the judgment sustaining the defendants’ demurrer and dismissing his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilder v. WilderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Hayes v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Helton v. ShellnutSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Pierce v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Shaprio v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API