Legal Opinion

Helton v. Shellnut

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1938No. 12175PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. Equity in a proper ease may reform a written contract because of fraud on one side and mistake on the other. A contract may also be reformed for a mistake of both parties, but the evidence must show “that the mistake was mutual.” Code, §§ 37-207, 37-208; Green v. Johnson, 153 Ga. 738 (3, 4) (113 S. E. 403).(a) In the instant ease, however, the petition did not allege fraud, nor did it contain sufficient allegations to show a mutual mistake. Where mistake is relied on, the petition must allege the particular mistake and show how it occurred. Williams v. Williams, 155 Ga. 622…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Blaylock v. HackelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Green v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Oliver v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Boynton v. ReeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Hemphill v. HemphillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Davis v. United American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  2. Myers v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Yablon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Mickle v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Minor v. FincherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API