Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Swaine (In Re Siegel)
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 29, 1989No. Civ. Nos. 89-441 PHX EHC, 89-654 PHX EHC, Bankruptcy Nos. B-87-6194 PHX RGM, B-87-6193 PHX RGM, Adv. Nos. 88-59, 88-357, 87-6193 and 88-44, BAP No. AZ-89-1058, AZ-89-1141PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARROLL, District Judge.
These consolidated appeals involve the issue of whether debtors may claim an exemption from the bankruptcy estate for their interests in qualified employee benefit plans pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(b) and Arizona Revised Statutes § 33-1126(B). Appellants/Debtors Siegel and Hirsch (appellants or debtors) appeal from orders of the bankruptcy court in their respective Chapter 11 proceedings entering partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs/appellees (appellees or trustees) on grounds that A.R.S. § 33-1126(B), on which the debtors base their claims for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Roy A. Cefalu v. B.F. Goodrich CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan (In Re Kaplan)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- In Re GainesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989
- Fogler v. Flindall (In Re Flindall)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1989
- In Re AlagnaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1989
- In Re ConroyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.