Legal Opinion

Manhattan Novelty Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 16, 1965No. Reap. Dec. 10919; Entry No. 1014468PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement listed above covers a shipment of five-tube radios, exported from Japan and appraised on the basis of export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165. The merchandise was entered at the invoice unit price and was appraised at the per se price of $4 per unit. The correct statutory basis of valuation is not in issue, since both parties agree that export value is the proper basis. However, plaintiff limits this appeal to the amount of the buying…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. Case & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Randbur Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Concord Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Reliance International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Sharwell Bros. Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Sharwell Bros. Shoe Co.. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API