Legal Opinion

Randbur Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 4, 1961No. Reap. Dec. 9962; Entry Nos. 797552; 857889; 823204PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OliveR, Chief Judge:

These three appeals for reappraisement, all of which were consolidated for trial by consent of the parties, involve certain cigarette lighters, exported from Japan and entered at the port of New York.

As the case was presented, it appears that there is no dispute in the per se values of the articles in dispute. The sole question before me is whether an item of commission included in the appraised value of the merchandise is, in fact, a buying commission, as claimed by plaintiff. If so, it is not part of the dutiable value of the merchandise and, hence, a nondutiable item.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. Case & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. BauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shalom Baby Wear, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Manhattan Novelty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Manhattan Novelty Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API