People v. Hurdle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“Selection procedures that purposefully exclude black persons from juries undermine public confidence in the fairness of our system of justice” (Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79, 87 [1986]). “The Batson framework is designed to produce actual answers to suspicions and inferences that discrimination may have infected the jury selection process” (Johnson v California, 545 US 162, 172 [2005]). The first step of the Batson framework requires that a defendant set forth a prima facie case “by showing that the totality of the relevant facts gives rise to an inference of discriminatory purpose” (Batson v…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- People v. ChildressNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. SmocumNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. BollingNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. HurdleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. CheryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. BrissettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. BrissettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.