Legal Opinion

People v. Bolling

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1992PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Simons, J.

These appeals, involving application of the rules developed in Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79), raise two questions: (1) whether a prima facie showing of discrimination may be *320established before completion of the jury selection process and (2) whether defense counsel established a prima facie case that the prosecution had violated the Equal Protection Clauses of the Federal and State Constitutions by exercising peremptory challenges for discriminatory purposes (US Const 14th Amend; NY Const, art I, § 11). In People v Bolling, we hold that defense counsel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Allen v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Holland v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. People v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. ChildressNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. PayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. SmocumNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. People v. HeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 2010

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API