Legal Opinion
Lizak v. Faria
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 29, 1981PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
180 N.J. Super. 248 (1981)
434 A.2d 659
DIANE LIZAK AND JOHN SOLANO AND MARGE SOLANO, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
MANUEL AND C. FARIA, TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, DEFENDANTS. MANUEL AND C. FARIA, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
DIANE LIZAK, JOHN AND MARGE SOLANO, TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Middlesex County.
Decided May 29, 1981.
William W. Hart, Jr. for Diane Lizak and John and Marge Solano.
James P. Nolan for Manuel and C. Faria (Venezia & Nolan, attorneys).
Robert F.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Donadio v. CunninghamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Kessler v. BowkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Foltz v. MonroevilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. East Lansdowne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Glabach v. SardelliSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- George Phillips Philip Vitale v. Borough of Keyport Victor Rhodes Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Manalapan Holding Co. v. Planning Board of HamiltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Lizak v. FariaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- City of Rutland v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Manalapan Holding Co. v. HAMILTON TP. PLAN. BD.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.