Legal Opinion

Foltz v. Monroeville

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1972No. Appeal, No. 536 C.D. 1971PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The Borough of Monroeville, its Planning Commission, its Zoning Officer and its Borough Manager, defendants below, appeal to us the order of summary judgment in mandamus by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. Appellee, James Foltz, Jr., in mandamus sought to compel the issuance of building-permits. Intervening- appellants who are residents of the neighborhood where Foltz’s proposed commercial *306enterprise is to be constructed, appeared as protestants at the zoning hearings which preceded the litigation.

The Borough, its allies in the local government, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. East Lansdowne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Beverly Building Corp. v. Lower Merion Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Giant Food Stores, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Bucks County Housing Development Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Gryshuk v. KolbCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Grim v. Borough of BoyertownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Croft v. Board of Supervisors of Middletown TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API